JAFESS recognizes that authors may occasionally disagree with an editorial decision or peer-review assessment. Authors have the right to formally appeal a rejection if they can demonstrate that the decision was influenced by a clear factual error, an evident misunderstanding of the science, or an objective breach of the peer-review process.
Appeals will only be considered under the following strict conditions:
Factual or Technical Error: The author provides definitive evidence that a reviewer or editor fundamentally misunderstood a core methodology, formula, data trend, or institutional variable, and that this specific error directly caused the manuscript's rejection.
Reviewer Bias or Conflict of Interest: The author supplies verifiable evidence demonstrating that a peer reviewer acted with structural bias or carried an undisclosed commercial or institutional conflict of interest.
Note: Rebuttals based purely on speculative scientific opinions, general text style disagreements, or the perceived novelty/impact of the research will be rejected without further assessment.
All formal editorial appeal letters and accompanying evidence should be sent directly to the JAFESS Editorial Office: [email protected]
JAFESS welcomes constructive feedback, concerns, or complaints regarding our editorial processes, journal policies, website management, or the behavior of our editorial staff, authors, and reviewers.
Who can complain: Anyone—including authors, reviewers, readers, or members of the public—can submit a formal complaint.