SOC for cybersecurity & SOC 2® for service organizations – An empirical study on industry’s perspective
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Businesses across the globe have been going digital. A paradigm that has been accelerated due to pandemic. This has resulted into creation of a complex cyberspace. Further, organizations have become linked and dependent on each other, due to increased outsourcing as well as shift towards cloud computing. This has also led to creation of various industry standards and frameworks that help organizations evaluate their own and their provider’s practices related to system reliability, information security and cybersecurity. Amongst these, SOC2 for service organizations and SOC for Cybersecurity are two leading reports that help organizations assess system reliability and cybersecurity. AICPA recognizes it has that there is confusion amongst the applicability of these reports, and therefore it has created some guidance on how these two reports are different and how they can be leveraged by organizations. This guidance provides an inside-out perspective driven by purpose of these reports and the methodology used to create these reports. The industry (practitioners, implementors and vendor managers, CXOs) perspective on the applicability and distinction of these reports was not yet available. This research brings out industry (practitioners, implementors and vendor managers, CXOs) perspective on the applicability and distinction of these reports. Findings indicate that SOC2 demand and usefulness is perceived high whereas SOC for Cybersecurity demand and usefulness is perceived low by the industry. Findings of this research also indicate that industry excepts AICPA to simplify SOC2 reports and make them easier to understand.
Keywords:
SOC2, SOC for Cybersecurity, Systems reliability, AICPA, Trust services criteriaArticle Metrics Graph
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Similar Articles
- Edman Padilla Flores, Sustainability reporting in Cambodia: A tale of two companies , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)
- Huseyin Güngör, The past, present, and future of management consulting: Findings from a global survey , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022)
- Nedhal Mohammed Gubran, Selvi Permata Groda, Artificial intelligence and big data for operational decision-making: A systematic review of trends and governance frameworks (2020–2025) , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026)
- Zubir Azhar, Does corporate social responsibility engagement reduce earnings management? Evidence from Cambodian-listed companies , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)
- Parmindar Singh, International financial reporting standards (IFRS), corporate social responsibility, and sustainable development , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Anil K. Makhija, Information security management systems - Evolving landscape & ISO 27001: An empirical study , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2021)
- Anil K. Makhija, Deep learning application – Identifying PII (personally identifiable information) to protect , Journal of Accounting, Finance, Economics, and Social Sciences: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020)